THOMPSON v. CHAO et al
| Cory Thompson |
| Stanley Chao, First Loan, Unknown ACH Processor and John Does 1-10 |
| 1:2022cv01342 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by CORY THOMPSON. STANLEY CHAO waiver sent on 7/20/2022. (Goldstein, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (NLR) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to STANLEY CHAO, FIRST LOAN. (NLR) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J. Goldstein on behalf of Plaintiff Cory Thompson. (Goldstein, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather A. Kolbus on behalf of Plaintiff Cory Thompson. (Kolbus, Heather) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel A. Edelman on behalf of Plaintiff Cory Thompson. (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT - CLASS ACTION against All Defendants, filed by Cory Thompson. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7177646) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Proposed Summons Stanley Chao, #12 Proposed Summons First Loan)(Edelman, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
