HAWKINS v. KNIGHT et al
| RAYMOND HAWKINS |
| WENDY KNIGHT and JACHO |
| 1:2022cv01434 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Order on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee. The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/29/2022. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (JSR)
|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff RAYMOND HAWKINS. (DRB) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Plaintiff RAYMOND HAWKINS. (DRB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff RAYMOND HAWKINS. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT)(DRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JACHO, WENDY KNIGHT, filed by RAYMOND HAWKINS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons)(DRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
