TOOLEY v. 5201 EAST THOMPSON LLC
Plaintiff: DENNIS TOOLEY
Defendant: 5201 EAST THOMPSON LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv01567
Filed: August 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting Plaintiff's #10 Consent Motion to Appear Telephonically at the Initial Pretrial Conference scheduled for October 12, 2022 at 11:30 a.m., (EST). The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 9/22/2022. (SWM)
September 21, 2022 Filing 10 Consent MOTION to Appear Telephonically, filed by Plaintiff DENNIS TOOLEY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mussman, Louis Ivan)
September 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE -This case is assigned for an initial pretrial conference before United States Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on October 12, 2022, at 11:30 a.m. in Room 234, Birch Bayh Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 46 East Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. All persons entering the United States Courthouse must have photo identification. The parties shall file the proposed CMP no less than three days prior to the pretrial conference. **SEE ORDER**(MGG)
August 29, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant 5201 EAST THOMPSON LLC. (Hagenow, Christopher)
August 29, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Charles Hagenow on behalf of Defendant 5201 EAST THOMPSON LLC. (Hagenow, Christopher)
August 25, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by DENNIS TOOLEY. 5201 EAST THOMPSON LLC served on 8/18/2022. (Mussman, Louis Ivan)
August 8, 2022 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
August 8, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 5201 EAST THOMPSON LLC. (DJH)
August 5, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric C. Bohnet on behalf of Plaintiff DENNIS TOOLEY. (Bohnet, Eric)
August 5, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Louis Ivan Christopher Mussman on behalf of Plaintiff DENNIS TOOLEY. (Mussman, Louis Ivan)
August 5, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 5201 EAST THOMPSON LLC, filed by DENNIS TOOLEY. (Filing fee $402, receipt number BINSDC-7223705) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Mussman, Louis Ivan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TOOLEY v. 5201 EAST THOMPSON LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DENNIS TOOLEY
Represented By: Eric C. Bohnet
Represented By: Louis Ivan Christopher Mussman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 5201 EAST THOMPSON LLC
Represented By: Christopher Charles Hagenow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?