J.E.C. v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION
Plaintiff: J E C
Defendant: BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2022cv01720
Filed: August 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Extension of Time, filed by Plaintiff J E C (Guenin-Hodson, Emily)
October 5, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of PARTIES First Extension of Time re Responding to any written request for discovery or admission, filed by Defendant BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION. (Shoultz, Richard) Modified on 10/11/2022 (CKM).
September 28, 2022 Filing 8 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendant BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION . (Shoultz, Richard)
September 13, 2022 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint , Affirmative Defenses and Jury Demand, filed by BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION.(Shoultz, Richard)
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 10/27/2022 01:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 8/31/2022.(SWM)
August 31, 2022 Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB)
August 30, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard K. Shoultz on behalf of Defendant BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION. (Shoultz, Richard)
August 30, 2022 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION. (DeRoss, John)
August 30, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John J DeRoss, Jr on behalf of Defendant BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION. (DeRoss, John)
August 30, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court 12, case number 49D12-2208-CT-025851, filed by BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7258165) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Complaint, Appearance of Emily Guenin-Hodson and Mark Guenin, Summons, Appearance of Richard K. Shoultz and John J. DeRoss, Jr. on behalf of Defendant, and Defendants Notice of Initial Enlargement of Time, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit State Court Complaint)(DeRoss, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: J.E.C. v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J E C
Represented By: Emily Christine Guenin-Hodson
Represented By: Mark C. Guenin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE CORPORATION
Represented By: Richard K. Shoultz
Represented By: John J DeRoss, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?