WILSON v. ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
DONNA WILSON |
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION |
1:2022cv01877 |
September 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Matthew P Brookman |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily M Stultz on behalf of Plaintiff DONNA WILSON. (Stultz, Emily) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 12/13/2022 at 12:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/26/2022.(JRB) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney David A. Campbell for ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 10/25/2022. (JRB) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Attorney(s) David A. Campbell to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-7336482), filed by Defendant ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification of David A. Campbell, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Meyer, John) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION.(Meyer, John) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION identifying Corporate Parent ROCHE HOLDINGS, LTD., Other Affiliate ROCHE HOLDINGS, INC. for ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION.. (Meyer, John) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by John D. Meyer on behalf of Defendant ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION. (Meyer, John) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by DONNA WILSON. ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION served on 9/29/2022. (Dutkanych, Andrew) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION. (DRB) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Dutkanych, III on behalf of Plaintiff DONNA WILSON. (Dutkanych, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION, filed by DONNA WILSON. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7293311) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Dutkanych, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: WILSON v. ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DONNA WILSON | |
Represented By: | Andrew Dutkanych, III |
Represented By: | Emily M Stultz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | David A. Campbell |
Represented By: | John D. Meyer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.