PIATT v. ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC.
| TARA PIATT |
| ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC. |
| 1:2022cv02062 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC..(Floyd, Michelle) |
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 1/23/2023 01:00 PM (Eastern Time) in Video Teleconference before Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. The Court will contact counsel by separate email with information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the Court's expectations for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 12/7/2022.(SWM)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC.. (Floyd, Michelle) |
| Filing 10 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendant ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC.. (Floyd, Michelle) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC.. (Floyd, Michelle) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle K. Floyd on behalf of Defendant ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC.. (Floyd, Michelle) |
| Filing 7 Reassignment of Case to Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number (1:22-cv-02062-JMS-KMB), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (JD) |
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DRB) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC.. (DRB) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael C. Cooley on behalf of Plaintiff TARA PIATT. (Cooley, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas S. Bowman on behalf of Plaintiff TARA PIATT. (Bowman, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC., filed by TARA PIATT. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7335105) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Bowman, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PIATT v. ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TARA PIATT | |
| Represented By: | Michael C. Cooley |
| Represented By: | Thomas S. Bowman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ROBBINS-MATHERLY-DILS AGENCY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Michelle K. Floyd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
