NAYLOR v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| JOHN NAYLOR |
| INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH and JOHN MERSHON |
| 1:2023cv00545 |
| March 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James R Sweeney |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF TORT CLAIM, filed by Plaintiff JOHN NAYLOR (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JOHN NAYLOR. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Prisoner Account, Resident Activity Report)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN MERSHON, DENNIS REAGLE, filed by JOHN NAYLOR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits including Facility Level Appeal, letters regarding tort claim, grievance records, requests for health care, Notice and Report of Action Taken on Correspondence, Notice of Tort Claim, Requests for Interviews, Receipt -- Administrative Remedy, Affidavit)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
