AYON v. FOSTER et al
| MANUEL GARCIA AYON, JR. |
| FOSTER, AFOLAYAN, BISHOP, HOCKEY and TISHA THOMPSON |
| 1:2024cv00756 |
| May 1, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
Order on In Forma Pauperis Status - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(4). Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time. (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 05/09/2024. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (AAT)
|
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MANUEL GARCIA AYON, JR. (Attachments: #1 Resident Statement)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AFOLAYAN, BISHOP, FOSTER, HOCKEY, TISHA THOMPSON, filed by MANUEL GARCIA AYON, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
