COOK v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY CUSTODY OFFICIAL'S/OFFICER'S
| JEFFERY COOK |
| PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY CUSTODY OFFICIAL'S/OFFICER'S |
| 1:2024cv01598 |
| September 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #6 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Sixteen Dollars and Sixty Cents ($16.60). The plaintiff shall have through November 22, 2024, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 10/23/24. Copy Sent via U.S. Mail. (CKM)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JEFFERY COOK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through 10/24/2024 in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 405.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Form Motion IFP) (MRI) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy to plaintiff by U.S. Mail (MEH) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY CUSTODY OFFICIAL'S/OFFICER'S, filed by JEFFERY COOK. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COOK v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY CUSTODY OFFICIAL'S/OFFICER'S | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JEFFERY COOK | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY CUSTODY OFFICIAL'S/OFFICER'S | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
