MEDLEY et al v. BLINKEN et al
Amelie Medley and Philip Edward Medley |
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR JADDOU, Tracy Tarango, ANTONY BLINKEN and MERRICK GARLAND |
1:2024cv01748 |
October 4, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Crystal S Wildeman |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Submission, filed by Hake & Schmitt. (JRB) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (AAS) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND, UR JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, TRACY TARANGO. (AAS) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Brian C. Schmitt to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-8368114), filed by Plaintiffs Amelie Medley, Philip Edward Medley. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Prop. Ord.)(Schmitt, Brian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8368090) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civ. Cov. Sht., #2 Proposed Summons Blinken, #3 Proposed Summons Civ. Pro. Clerk, #4 Proposed Summons Garland, #5 Proposed Summons Jaddou, #6 Proposed Summons Mayorkas, #7 Proposed Summons Tarango)(Schmitt, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.