REYNOLDS v. ASTRUE
| RICHARD J. REYNOLDS |
| MICHAEL J. ASTRUE |
| SSA (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2009cv00302 |
| September 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Vigo |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Richard L. Young |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER - denying 35 Motion to Seal its opinion. The Court emphasizes that remote access to administrative and medical records has always been barred under Rule 5.2(c). (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/10/2012. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
29
ENTRY Reviewing The Commissioner's Decision: For the reasons detailed in this Order, the Court VACATES the ALJ's decision denying Mr. Reynolds' benefits and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C . § 405(g) (sentence four). Because Mr. Reynolds' claim has been pending for so long (more than eleven years, including three hearings and two trips to this Court) and there is a significant chance on remand that he could be awarded benefits, this Court recommends that the Commissioner expedite the claim and appoint a new ALJ who is certain to account for all of Mr. Reynolds' mental and physical limitations. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/7/2010.(NKD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
