HATCHER v. MCMATH et al
| ROBERT HATCHER |
| PATRICIA MCMATH, RUTH JOHNSON and MARGRET G. ROBB |
| 2:2012cv00163 |
| June 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
ENTRY AND ORDER Directing Dismissal of Action. For the reasons explained in this Entry, the complaint of Robert Hatcher fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and the action is therefore dismissed. The foregoing shows that the d efendants and each of them cannot be liable to Hatcher under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and for this reason his complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The dismissal of the action is now mandatory. Gladney v. Pendleton Corr. Facility, 302 F.3d 773, 775 (7th Cir. 2002). Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (S.O.) (copy to plaintiff via U.S. Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/9/2012.(MAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
