SPRY v. SMITH
| DAVID A. SPRY |
| BRIAN SMITH |
| PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only) |
| 2:2017cv00120 |
| March 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
Entry Discussing Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Denying Certificate of Appealability - An Indiana jury found David Spry guilty of attempted murder. Spry now challenges that conviction, seeking a writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons exp lained in this Entry, Spry's petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be denied and the action dismissed with prejudice. In addition, the Court finds that a certificate of appealability should not issue. Judgment consistent with this Entry sh all now issue. Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court finds that Spry has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find it "debatable whether [this court] was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). The Court therefore declines to issue a certificate of appealability. (See Entry). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/27/2017.(APD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
