HEFFERN v. STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner: MICHAEL P. HEFFERN
Respondent: DICK BROWN and STATE OF INDIANA
Miscellaneous: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Case Number: 2:2017cv00410
Filed: August 28, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: Larry J. McKinney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus And Denying a Certificate of Appealability - Petitioner Michael P. Heffern is serving a 75-year sentence for his 2010 Jay County, Indiana convictions for murder and robbery. This Court has carefully reviewed the state record in light of Mr. Heffern's claims and has given such consideration to those claims as the limited scope of its review in a habeas corpus proceeding permits. Having applied the appropriate standard of review, and havi ng considered the pleadings and the record, Mr. Heffern's petition for writ of habeas corpus must be denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. (See Order.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 11/13/2018. (DMW)
October 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 35 Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus And Denying a Certificate of Appealability - Petitioner Michael P. Heffern is serving a 75-year sentence for his 2010 Jay County, Indiana convictions for murder and robbery. He brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This Court has carefully reviewed the state record in light of Mr. Heffern's claims and has given such consideration to those claims as the limited scope of its review in a habeas corpus proceeding permits. Having applied the appropriate standard of review, and having considered the pleadings and the record, Mr. Heffern's petition for writ of habeas corpus must be denied. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. (See Order.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 10/3/2018. (DMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HEFFERN v. STATE OF INDIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DICK BROWN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MICHAEL P. HEFFERN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Miscellaneous: WVCF (Court Use Only)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?