REED v. BERRYHILL
DIANNA LYNN REED |
NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
2:2018cv00344 |
August 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Doris L Pryor |
James R Sweeney |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Reassignment of Case Pursuant to Local Rule 40-1(f), the above matter was reassigned from Chief Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson to Judge James R. Sweeney II on September 24, 2018. The cause number has been changed to reflect the newly assigned Judge. Please note that cause number 2:18-cv-00344-DLP-JRS must be used on all future filings. (NLR) |
Filing 9 PLEASE DISREGARD DOCKETED IN ERROR: Reassignment of Case to Judge James R. Sweeney II. Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number ( 2:18-cv-344-JRS-DLP), which includes the initials of the newly assigned judge, on all future filings in this matter. (JD) Modified on 9/25/2018 (NLR). |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge - This case is referred to the currently assigned United States magistrate judge to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge assigned the date of this order, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. Counsel shall use altered cause number 2:18-cv-00344-DLP-JMS. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/6/2018.(DMW) |
Filing 7 JOINT CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant NANCY A. BERRYHILL. (Wierenga, Julian) |
Filing 5 ENTRY - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted. Copy via U.S. Mail pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/9/2018. (DMW) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff DIANNA LYNN REED. (HET) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy E. Staggs on behalf of Plaintiff DIANNA LYNN REED. (HET) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL, filed by DIANNA LYNN REED. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(HET) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: REED v. BERRYHILL | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL | |
Represented By: | Julian Clifford Wierenga |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: DIANNA LYNN REED | |
Represented By: | Timothy E. Staggs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.