FORT'E v. BROWN
| DAMON FORT'E |
| RICHARD BROWN |
| 2:2018cv00416 |
| September 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| William T Lawrence |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by RICHARD BROWN. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 12/11/2018. (Recker, Abigail) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Abigail Recker on behalf of Respondent RICHARD BROWN. (Recker, Abigail) |
| Filing 5 RECEIPT #IP062404 for Writ of Habeas Corpus fee in the amount of $5.00, paid by Petitioner. (HET) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) - Damon Fort'e's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in disciplinary case number CIC 17-06-0172. The petitioner shall have through October 17, 2018, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. Show Cause Response due by 10/30/2018 (SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITONAL INFORMATION). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/18/2018. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. (DWH)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DWH) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by DAMON FORT'E. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DWH) |
| Filing 1 ENTRY (Disciplinary Proceedings: CIC 17-06-0172): The petitioner filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on September 12, 2018. In his petition, he challenges seven disciplinary proceedings: CIC 17-06-0166, CIC 17-06-0167, CIC 17-06-0168, CIC 17-06-0169, CIC 17-06-0170, CIC 17-06-0171, and CIC 17-06-0172. The Nature of Suit ("NOS") of each newly opened action will be 530 and the Cause of Action ("COA") will be 28:2254. A copy of this Entry and a copy of the petition, shall be docketed in the new civil actions. The petitioner is Damon Fort'e and the Respondent is Richard Brown, Warden. This action shall be linked on the docket with each of the new civil actions. The assignment of judicial officers to the new civil actions shall be by random draw (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/13/2018.(DWH) Modified on 9/17/2018 (DWH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FORT'E v. BROWN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: RICHARD BROWN | |
| Represented By: | Abigail Recker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DAMON FORT'E | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
