CHASE v. SMITH et al
| KENNETH CHASE |
| BRIAN SMITH, J. R. SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, J. LYTTLE, NAWMAN and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 2:2019cv00207 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT LEAVE TO FILE EXHIBIT WITH EX PARTE RESTRICTION - granting #8 Motion to submit certain exhibit with ex parte restriction. The Respondent is GRANTED leave to file with ex parte restriction: confidential security video photos (Confidential Exhibit H). That ex parte restriction shall be maintained on this exhibit. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/18/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Submit Evidence with Ex Parte Restriction, filed by Respondents ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J. LYTTLE, NAWMAN, BRIAN SMITH, J. R. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Text of Proposed Order)(Corey, David) |
| Filing 7 RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #4 Order to Show Cause (Disciplinary), filed by ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J. LYTTLE, NAWMAN, BRIAN SMITH, J. R. SMITH.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A Conduct Report, #2 Exhibit Ex. A-1 Investigation Report, #3 Exhibit Ex. B Screening Report, #4 Exhibit Ex. C Disciplinary Hearing Report, #5 Exhibit Ex. D Facility Level Appeal, Response, #6 Exhibit Ex. E DOC Appeal Response, #7 Exhibit Ex. F Nauman Declaration, #8 Exhibit Ex. G IDOC Offenses 2018, #9 Exhibit Ex. G-1 IDOC Offenses 2015)(Corey, David) |
| Filing 6 Respondent's Notice of 42-day Extension of Deadline to File a Return to Order Show Cause, filed by ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, J. LYTTLE, NAWMAN, BRIAN SMITH, J. R. SMITH. Return to Order to Show Cause deadline is 7/29/2019. (Corey, David) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Corey on behalf of Respondent BRIAN SMITH. (Corey, David) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Discipline Case) - Kenneth Chase's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in ISF 18-08-0074 on August 17, 2018. The petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted. (Show Cause Response due by 6/17/2019.) (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 5/6/2019. (DMW)
|
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner, KENNETH CHASE. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit and Transaction History, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by KENNETH CHASE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 instructions for petition, #2 Exhibit A Report of Conduct, #3 Exhibit B Report of Investigation of Incident, #4 Exhibit C Report of Disciplinary Hearing, #5 Exhibit D letter containing decision, #6 Proposed Summons)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
