AKERS v. SIEREVELD
Plaintiff: MONTGOMERY AKERS
Defendant: KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD
Case Number: 2:2020cv00377
Filed: July 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2020 Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by MONTGOMERY AKERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
July 31, 2020 Filing 9 RESPONSE re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Plaintiff MONTGOMERY AKERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
July 29, 2020 Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed without prejudice. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/29/2020.(KAA)
July 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - Mr. Akers is the plaintiff in this action, which Defendant Katherine Siereveld removed to this Court on July 22, 2020, from Vigo Superior Court. Because Mr. Akers remains prohibited from filing papers in this Court, he will be unable to prosecute the action. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. Ms. Siereveld's motion to stay pending screening, dkt. #3 , is denied as unnecessary. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/29/2020. (KAA)
July 27, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
July 23, 2020 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA)
July 22, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Stay Pending Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, filed by Defendant KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - N.D. Cal. Order, #2 Exhibit 2 - S.D. Ill. Order, #3 Exhibit 3 - 7th Circuit Order, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Shields, Gina)
July 22, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Gina M. Shields on behalf of Defendant KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD. (Shields, Gina)
July 22, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Vigo Superior Court 2, case number 84D02-2006-MI-3040, filed by KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record (Docket, Complaint, Summons, Appearance, Motion for Fee Waiver, Order on Fee Waiver, Return Receipt, Correspondence), #2 Exhibit - Operative Complaint, #3 Exhibit - BOP Inmate Locator, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shields, Gina)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AKERS v. SIEREVELD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD
Represented By: Gina M. Shields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MONTGOMERY AKERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?