AKERS v. SIEREVELD
MONTGOMERY AKERS |
KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD |
2:2020cv00377 |
July 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mark J Dinsmore |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by MONTGOMERY AKERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Plaintiff MONTGOMERY AKERS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS) |
Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed without prejudice. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/29/2020.(KAA) |
Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT - Mr. Akers is the plaintiff in this action, which Defendant Katherine Siereveld removed to this Court on July 22, 2020, from Vigo Superior Court. Because Mr. Akers remains prohibited from filing papers in this Court, he will be unable to prosecute the action. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. Ms. Siereveld's motion to stay pending screening, dkt. #3 , is denied as unnecessary. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/29/2020. (KAA) |
Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Stay Pending Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, filed by Defendant KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - N.D. Cal. Order, #2 Exhibit 2 - S.D. Ill. Order, #3 Exhibit 3 - 7th Circuit Order, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Shields, Gina) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Gina M. Shields on behalf of Defendant KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD. (Shields, Gina) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Vigo Superior Court 2, case number 84D02-2006-MI-3040, filed by KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record (Docket, Complaint, Summons, Appearance, Motion for Fee Waiver, Order on Fee Waiver, Return Receipt, Correspondence), #2 Exhibit - Operative Complaint, #3 Exhibit - BOP Inmate Locator, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shields, Gina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: AKERS v. SIEREVELD | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: KATHERINE N. SIEREVELD | |
Represented By: | Gina M. Shields |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MONTGOMERY AKERS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.