MORRIS v. STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner: OCTAVIUS MORRIS
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Case Number: 2:2020cv00618
Filed: November 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Doris L Pryor
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER - The petitioner's motion for extension of time, dkt. #9 , is granted. The petitioner shall have through March 8, 2021, in which to respond to the Court's Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 1/14/2021 (Copy mailed per distribution list). (TMC)
January 13, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time, filed by Petitioner OCTAVIUS MORRIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
December 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The petitioner shall have through February 1, 2021, in which to respond to the Court's Order to Show Cause. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/14/2020. (KAA)
December 11, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time in which to Reply to #3 Order to Show Cause, filed by Petitioner OCTAVIUS MORRIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
December 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER - The petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel, dkt. #4 , is therefore denied. See Order. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/8/2020. (KAA)
December 7, 2020 Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by OCTAVIUS MORRIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
December 7, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Petitioner OCTAVIUS MORRIS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AAS)
December 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The petitioner shall have through December 31, 2020, in which to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed as time-barred. The clerk is directed to include a 2254 petition form with the petitioner's copy of this Order. If the petitioner responds to this Order, he should complete the form petition and explain why his claims are not time-barred. SEE ORDER. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 2254 Petition form)(KAA)
November 24, 2020 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
November 23, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by OCTAVIUS MORRIS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Public Defenders of Indiana Notice of Non Representation; Copy Requests; Case Summary, #2 Envelope). (AKH) Modified on 11/24/2020 (AKH).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MORRIS v. STATE OF INDIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: OCTAVIUS MORRIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?