BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. v. CROWDER TRUCKING, LLC et al
| BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. |
| CROWDER TRUCKING, LLC and ROGER CROWDER |
| 2:2021cv00112 |
| February 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Contract: Other |
| 28:1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent BMO FINANCIAL CORP, Corporate Parent BANK OF MONTREAL for BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A... (Pille, Ann) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann E. Pille on behalf of Plaintiff BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.. (Pille, Ann) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROGER CROWDER, CROWDER TRUCKING, LLC, filed by BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A.. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6427048) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Loan and Security Agreement, #2 Exhibit B-Loan and Security Agreement, #3 Exhibit C-Loan and Security Agreement, #4 Exhibit D-Loan and Security Agreement, #5 Exhibit E-Continuing Guaranty, #6 Exhibit F-Loan and Security Agreement, #7 Exhibit G-Reschedule Agreement, #8 Exhibit H- Correspondence, #9 Exhibit I-Loan Calculator, #10 Exhibit J-Loan Calculator, #11 Exhibit K-Loan Calculator, #12 Exhibit L-Loan Calculator, #13 Exhibit M-Loan Calculator, #14 Civil Cover Sheet, #15 Proposed Summons)(Pille, Ann) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
