SWEENEY v. VANIHEL
Plaintiff: CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR.
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL
Case Number: 2:2021cv00329
Filed: September 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew A. Kobe on behalf of Respondent FRANK VANIHEL. (Kobe, Andrew)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (State Conviction) - CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR.'s petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges the petitioner's conviction and sentence in Indiana state court case number 10C01-9403-CF-051. Respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by October 13, 2021. If respondent argues that all claims in the petition are subject to one of the procedural bars for dismissal outlined in Rule 5(b), respondent is ORDERED to file a motion to dismiss based on a complete procedural bar by November 12, 2021. If Track 1 does not apply, respondent is ORDERED to answer the petition by December 3, 2021. The Court does not anticipate extending respondent's deadlines absent respondent specifically setting forth extraordinary circumstances (SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEADLINES) The petitioner's motion for order to show cause, dkt. #6 , is denied as moot. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/1/2021.(TPS)
September 23, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Order to Show Cause, filed by Plaintiff CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(TPS)
September 9, 2021 Filing 5 Correspondence Regarding Filing Fee, filed by Plaintiff CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR (JRB)
September 9, 2021 Filing 4 RECEIPT #IP075681 for Writ of Habeas Corpus fee in the amount of $5, paid by Petitioner. (LMK)
September 2, 2021 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS)
September 2, 2021 Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Order)(TPS)
September 2, 2021 Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (TPS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SWEENEY v. VANIHEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES E. SWEENEY, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANK VANIHEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?