UL-HASSAN v. WARDEN
Petitioner: MAHMOOD UL-HASSAN
Respondent: WARDEN
Case Number: 2:2022cv00257
Filed: June 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mario Garcia
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2022 Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. The action is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Copy sent to petitioner via US mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/25/2022.(TPS)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Dismissing Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence for Lack of Jurisdiction and Denying a Certificate of Appealability - Petitioner's second 2255 petition must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. He previously filed a 2255 petition, which was denied on the merits, and Petitioner has not obtained permission from the Seventh Circuit to pursue a second or successive petition. A habeas petitioner does not have the absolute right to appeal a district court's denial of his habeas petition, rather, he must first request a certificate of appealability. The Court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. Judgment consistent with this Order shall now issue and a copy of this Order shall be docketed in United States v. Ul-Hassan, 2:90-cr-00006-JPH-CMM-3. (SEE ORDER.) Copy sent to petitioner via US mail. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 8/25/2022. (TPS)
July 22, 2022 Filing 4 Response to Order at #3 , filed by Petitioner MAHMOOD UL-HASSAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS) Modified on 8/24/2022 - corrected title of document (RSF).
July 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Dismissing Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence and Directing Petitioner to Show Cause why Judgment Should Not Enter - Petitioner's second 2255 petition must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The petitioner shall have through August 9, 2022, in which to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (SEE ORDER.) Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 7/6/2022.(TPS)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order Directing Treatment of Post-Judgment Motion and Directing Opening of New Civil Action - The defendant's motion for resentencing because he allegedly no longer qualifies as a career criminal shall be treated as a motion seeking relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. The clerk shall therefore open a new civil action in the Terre Haute Division and re-docket the motion to resentence, dkt. 10 , as the defendant's motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. (See 2:90-cr-0006-JPH-CMM.) Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 6/28/2022.(KAA)
June 28, 2022 Filing 1 Motion to Vacate Sentence, filed by MAHMOOD UL-HASSAN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KAA) Modified on 6/28/2022 to correct title/event (KAA).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UL-HASSAN v. WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MAHMOOD UL-HASSAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?