RUTHRAUFF v. CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC. et al
| MARK RUTHRAUFF |
| SARA BEDWELL, CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY, CENTURION, LLC., KIM HOBSON, BARBARA RIGGS, SAMUEL BYRD, STEVEN FISHER, FRANK VANIHEL, HOLCOMB, K. KELLAMS, JACOBS-CAMPBELL, KIERRA ROE and SHANTEL DOE |
| 2:2024cv00198 |
| May 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER ON MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #7 , is GRANTED to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Nineteen Dollars and Four Cents ($19.04). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1); Whitaker v. Dempsey, 83 F.4th 1059, 1061 (7th Cir. 2023) (stating that even a prisoner with $2000 in assets might be eligible to proceed in forma pauperis). The plaintiff shall have through August 9, 2024, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. See Order. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 7/11/2024. (LF)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MARK RUTHRAUFF. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(LF) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Your civil rights complaint has been received. You shall have through July 12, 2024, in which to correct the deficiencies as follows: You must either pay the 405.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate that you lack the financial ability to do so by filing a motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee (in forma pauperis). A form motion for leave to proceed without the prepayment of the filing fee is being provided for your use. NOTE TO PRISONER - If you seek leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, and you are a prisoner, your motion must be accompanied by a copy of the transactions associated with your institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action. (Attachments: #1 Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis) (JRT) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against SARA BEDWELL, SAMUEL BYRD, CENTUIRON HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC., CENTURION, LLC., SHANTEL DOE, STEVEN FISHER, KIM HOBSON, HOLCOMB, JACOBS-CAMPBELL, K. KELLAMS, BARBARA RIGGS, STEPHANY LYNNE RILEY, KIERRA ROE, FRANK VANIHEL, filed by MARK RUTHRAUFF. (No fee paid with this filing) (CCG) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by MARK RUTHRAUFF located at WVCF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by MARK RUTHRAUFF to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
