CHANDLER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| ROGER CHANDLER |
| MAJOR DURREGAR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, HEATHER RUSSELL, CARMEN BABB and TRICIA PRETORIUS |
| 2:2024cv00286 |
| June 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Mario Garcia |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis sent to ROGER CHANDLER at Putnamville CF. (AAS) *Returned to court authority on release per DOC website. No new address reported.* - Modified on 8/2/2024 (JRT). |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #8 , is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Sixty- Four Dollars and Fifty Cents ($64.50). The plaintiff shall have through August 8, 2024, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. The plaintiff is informed that after the initial partial filing fee is paid, he will be obligated to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income each month that the amount in his account exceeds $10.00, until the full filing fee of $350.00 is paid. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 07/12/2024. (AAS)
|
| Filing 8 Renewed MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ROGER CHANDLER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(LBT) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER denying #3 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS PRESENTED - Plaintiff shall have through July 10, 2024, to either pay the $405.00 filing fee or to renew his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by filing a statement of his inmate trust account transactions for the previous six months. Failure to take either of these actions within the time provided may result in the dismissal of this action without further warning or opportunity to show cause. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 06/12/2024. (AAS)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ROGER CHANDLER. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against CARMEN BABB, MAJOR DURREGAR, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRICIA PRETORIUS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, HEATHER RUSSELL, filed by ROGER CHANDLER. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by ROGER CHANDLER located at PUTNAMVILLE CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by ROGER CHANDLER to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
