STONE v. REAGLE et al
| ROBERT STONE |
| CHRISTINA REAGLE, CHARLIE FOX, DENNIS REAGLE, LAURA BODKIN, BRANDY WIDENER, ISAAC RANDOLPH, AARON BENEFIEL, TISHA THOMPSON, LORI FISH and S. EDMONDS |
| 2:2025cv00136 |
| March 14, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (KLS) (DJH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT STONE. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AARON BENEFIEL, LAURA BODKIN, S. EDMONDS, LORI FISH, CHARLIE FOX, ISAAC RANDOLPH, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, TISHA THOMPSON, BRANDY WIDENER, filed by ROBERT STONE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits including Grievance records, Grievance Appeal records, Disciplinary Hearing Appeal records, Classification Appeal records, Tort Claim records, medical records,, #2 Affidavit In Support)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
