DUNEGHY v. TRIANGLE ENTERPRISES, INC.

Plaintiff: TEDDY DUNEGHY
Defendant: TRIANGLE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00142
Filed: June 25, 2013
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Evansville Office
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Referring Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 2, 2015 52 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying Plaintiff's 44 Motion for Relief from Final Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 10/2/2015. (TMD)
May 4, 2015 41 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 40 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/4/2015. (TMD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DUNEGHY v. TRIANGLE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TEDDY DUNEGHY
Represented By: Jared Michel Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TRIANGLE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?