BLAIR et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
Plaintiff: DENESSA V. BLAIR
Defendant: PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Case Number: 3:2014cv00018
Filed: February 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Evansville Office
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Presiding Judge: William G. Hussmann
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 372 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 344 Motion for Reconsideration and denying Plaintiff's 346 Motion for 2nd Stage Collective Class Certification. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 8/17/2017. (TMD)
March 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 339 ORDER granting Defendants' 281 Motion to Decertify Collective Action and granting in part and denying in part as moot Defendants' 304 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/22/2017. (TMD)
September 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 232 ORDER OVERRULING Defendants' 223 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/1/2015. (TMD) (Main Document 232 replaced on 9/1/2015) (TMD).
March 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 196 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 170 Motion to Compel. The Defendants will serve the required documents within 15 days of this Entry. (See Order for further details) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr., on 3/9/2015. (NRN)
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 187 ORDER - granting in part and denying in part 170 Motion to Compel. I DENY the Plaintiffs' Motion in that I find that the documents identified in the Defendants' privilege log entries 63, 65-71, 94-95, 97-98, 101-102, 116-19, and 123 are irrelevant and need not be produced. I GRANT the Plaintiffs' Motion in that I find that the Defendants have provided insufficient information to determine whether any remaining documents are subject to a claim of privilege. The Defendants will file all remaining documents in unredacted form within 10 business days of the issuance of this Entry for the Court's in camera review. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 1/29/2015. (RSF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BLAIR et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DENESSA V. BLAIR
Represented By: Joseph H. Cassell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Represented By: Linda Joy Cooley
Represented By: Libby Yin Goodknight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RONALD D. ROMAIN
Represented By: Linda Joy Cooley
Represented By: Libby Yin Goodknight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?