MILLER v. PERFECTION HYDRAULICS et al
Plaintiff: JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Defendant: GLEN KING, JOHN POOLE, PERFECTION HYDRAULICS and ANDREA SHOFNER
Case Number: 3:2018cv00128
Filed: July 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Evansville Office
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: Richard L Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying #14 Motion to Recuse - SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/11/2018. (JRB) Modified on 9/11/2018 (JRB).
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order Denying Plaintiff's September 7, 2018 #12 Motion - The Court has no authority to order either type of pre-judgment relief. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/11/2018. (JRB)
September 10, 2018 Filing 14 MOTION to Recuse, filed by Plaintiff JESHA DONALDSON MILLER. (JRB)
September 10, 2018 Filing 13 Submission of Earnings Statement, filed by Plaintiff JESHA DONALDSON MILLER. (JRB)
September 7, 2018 Filing 12 MOTION to Continue, filed by Plaintiff JESHA DONALDSON MILLER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB)
August 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying #10 Motion for Extension of Time - Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 8/20/2018. (JRB)
August 17, 2018 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond, filed by Plaintiff JESHA DONALDSON MILLER. (JRB)
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Court Action and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss - Plaintiff Jesha Donaldson Miller's July 26, 2018, motion for Court action, dkt. #6 , is denied. The August 3, 2018, defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, dkt. #8 , is denied without prejudice because it was not filed by an attorney. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. Copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 8/7/2018. (JRB)
August 3, 2018 Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, filed by Defendants GLEN KING, PERFECTION HYDRAULICS, JOHN POOLE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Envelope)(JRB)
August 2, 2018 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by GLEN KING, PERFECTION HYDRAULICS, JOHN POOLE. GLEN KING waiver sent on 7/24/2018; PERFECTION HYDRAULICS waiver sent on 7/24/2018; JOHN POOLE waiver sent on 7/24/2018. (JRB)
July 26, 2018 Filing 6 MOTION for Court Action, filed by Plaintiff JESHA DONALDSON MILLER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB) Modified on 7/26/2018 (JRB).
July 24, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as 1) Perfection Hydraulics; 2) Andrea Shofner; 3) Glen King; 4) John Poole (JRB)
July 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Granting In Forma Pauperis Status And Directing Issuance and Service of Process - Plaintiff Jesha Donaldson Miller's June 19, 2018, motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is granted The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Perfection Hydraulics, Andrea Shofner, Glen King, and John Poole in the manner specified byRule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint, dkt. 1, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 7/24/2018. (JRB)
July 19, 2018 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB)
July 19, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JESHA DONALDSON MILLER. (JRB)
July 19, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GLEN KING, PERFECTION HYDRAULICS, JOHN POOLE, and ANDREA SHOFNER, filed by JESHA DONALDSON MILLER. (No fee paid with this filing) (JRB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MILLER v. PERFECTION HYDRAULICS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GLEN KING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN POOLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PERFECTION HYDRAULICS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREA SHOFNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?