WILLIAMS v. WEDDING
| LLOYD KENNETH WILLIAMS |
| VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT, VANDERBURGH SUPERIOR COURT, DAVID WEDDING and VANDERBRUGH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX |
| 3:2018cv00145 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Evansville Office |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael E. DiRienzo on behalf of Defendant DAVID WEDDING. (DiRienzo, Michael) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey W. Ahlers on behalf of Defendant DAVID WEDDING. (Ahlers, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by DAVID WEDDING. DAVID WEDDING waiver sent on 8/31/2018. (JRB) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE, re #6 Entry, filed by Plaintiff LLOYD KENNETH WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MAT) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/5/2018. (JRB)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons Issued by Clerk as to DAVID WEDDING. (LBT) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY Screening Amended Complaint and Directing Service of Process - The plaintiff's claim for defamation of character is dismissed. The plaintiff's failure to protect claim against David Wedding shall proceed. The claim is based on Mr. Wedding's failure to inform Jefferson County that the plaintiff should be separated from William Hamar. If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the amended complaint, but not identified by the Court he shall have through September 28, 2018, in which to identify those claims. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) to issue process to the defendant David Wedding in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the amended complaint filed on August 29, 2018, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 8/31/2018 (copy mailed to plaintiff).(LBT) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff LLOYD KENNETH WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against DAVID WEDDING, filed by LLOYD KENNETH WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
|
Filing 3
Entry Dismissing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff shall have through September 25, 2018, in which to either pay the $400.00filing fee for this action or demonstrate that he lacks the financial ability to do so. plaintiff's complaint must be dismissed for each of the reasons set forth above. The plaintiff shall have through September 25, 2018, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue or to file an amended complaint. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 8/17/2018.(JRB)
|
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VANDERBRUGH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT, VANDERBURGH SUPERIOR COURT, DAVID WEDDING, filed by LLOYD KENNETH WILLIAMS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
