DIXON v. LOWERY et al
Plaintiff: ALBERT DIXON
Defendant: MS. BYERS, LOWERY, J. HOOLEY, NICHOLAS and BYRLEY
Case Number: 3:2019cv00029
Filed: February 12, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: Richard L Young
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENTRY DIRECTING RE-ISSUANCE AND SERVICE OF PROCESS - The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to re-issue process to defendantOfficer Byrley in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint (dkt.1), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), the Screening Order of March 26, 2019 (dkt. 11), and this Entry. Copy sent to parties via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 4/2/2019.(JRB)
March 29, 2019 Filing 16 Non-Party Communication Relating to Restricted Address of Officer Byrley (JRB)
March 29, 2019 Filing 15 Entry Documenting Non-Party Communication - The clerk is directed to docket the email correspondence with access restricted only to court users. This address information may be further disclosed to the United States' Marshal or his designee to assist with service. The clerk is further directed to update the docket to reflect the correct spelling of defendant Officer Byers last name as Byrley. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/29/2019.(JRB)
March 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER - NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS : The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Pro se litigants should read this Notice carefully before filing anything further with the Court. All litigants are expected to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules. Therefore, the rules and procedures contained in this Notice are not all of the rules pro se litigants must follow. *SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION* Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/26/2019.(JRB)
March 26, 2019 Filing 13 Documents for Service by IDOC - re #1 Complaint, #12 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk, #11 Entry as to 1) Lieutenant Lowery ; 2) Case Manager J. Hooley ; 3) Sergeant Nicholas; and 4) Correctional Officer Byers. (JRB)
March 26, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk as to 1) Lieutenant Lowery ; 2) Case Manager J. Hooley ; 3) Sergeant Nicholas; and 4) Correctional Officer Byers (JRB)
March 26, 2019 Filing 11 ENTRY SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING SERVICE - The clerk is directed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) to issue process to defendants Lieutenant Lowery, Case Manager J. Hooley, Sergeant Nicholas, and Correctional Officer Byers in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the complaint filed February 12, 2019, dkt. 1, applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. The clerk is directed to serve the Indiana Department of Correction employees electronically. The Eighth Amendment claims against Lieutenant Lowery, Case Manager J. Hooley, Sergeant Nicholas, and Correctional Officer Byers shall proceed. This summary includes all of the viable claims identified by the court in the complaint. If the plaintiff believes that additional claims were alleged in the complaint, but not identified by thecourt, he shall have through April 19, 2019, in which to identify those claims. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/26/2019.(JRB)
March 22, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address to 3501 Jefferson Ave. Evansville, IN 47714 for ALBERT DIXON. (JRB)
March 4, 2019 Filing 9 RECEIPT #EV6605 for Partial Filing Fee fee in the amount of $4.40, paid by Albert Dixon. (JRB)
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - The plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filling fee of Four Dollars and Forty Cents ($4.40). He shall have through April 1, 2018, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/28/2019. (JRB)
February 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying #5 Motion to Add Witness - SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/28/2019. (JRB)
February 20, 2019 Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ALBERT DIXON. (JRB)
February 20, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Add Witness, filed by Plaintiff ALBERT DIXON. (JRB)
February 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Heshall have until March 14, 2019, in which to renew his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by attaching a copy of the transactions associated with his institution trust account for the 6-month period preceding the filing of this action on February 12, 2019. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/15/2019. (JRB)
February 12, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB)
February 12, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ALBERT DIXON. (JRB)
February 12, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BYERS, J. HOOLEY, LOWERY, NICHOLAS, filed by ALBERT DIXON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(JRB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DIXON v. LOWERY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MS. BYERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LOWERY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. HOOLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NICHOLAS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BYRLEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALBERT DIXON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?