CRAIG & LANDRETH, INC. et al v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff: |
JAMES H. SMITH, JR. and LARRY CRAIG |
Defendant: |
MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC. |
Dealer Code No. 34514: |
CRAIG & LANDRETH, INC. |
Case Number: |
4:2007cv00134 |
Filed: |
October 5, 2007 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Office: |
O Office |
County: |
Clark |
Presiding Judge: |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Presiding Judge: |
William G. Hussmann |
Nature of Suit: |
Contract: Other |
Cause of Action: |
O |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
January 27, 2011 |
Filing
227
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE - 184 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Plaintiffs' Individual Damages is GRANTED. See order for details. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/27/2011. (LBT)
|
October 29, 2010 |
Filing
178
ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS - 162 Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. See Entry for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 10/29/2010. (LBT)
|
October 7, 2010 |
Filing
172
ORDER granting in part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - 105 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with regard to Counts II, III, IV, V and VI of Plaintiff's Complaint and DENIED with regard to Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/7/2010. (LBT)
|
March 12, 2010 |
Filing
148
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE - Having carefully considered the parties' arguments, we hereby DENY 123 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 121 Reply in Support of 105 Motion for Summary Judgment, but accept Plaintiffs' Surreply Brief, filed concurrently with the motion. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 3/12/2010. (LBT) Modified on 3/15/2010 to create docket entry relationship to Doc #105 (JLM).
|
February 9, 2010 |
Filing
142
ORDER denying 129 Fifth Motion to Compel Discovery Responses and Request for Sanctions. The court takes under advisement whether sanctions lesser than default - or any sanctions at all - should be assessed until a time in which it is able to more completely ascertain what data was, in fact, necessary to calculate the allocation formula. See Order for particulars. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 2/9/2010. (LBT)
|
January 6, 2010 |
Filing
132
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' RULE 56(F) REQUEST AND CONTINUING TRIAL SETTING - Plaintiffs' Rule 56(f) Request (contained in 116 Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are permitted 30 days from the da te of this entry to complete the requested discovery relating to Count I of its Complaint. Plaintiffs are permitted an additional 15 days within which to file their supplemental response, which submission shall not exceed 20 pages in length. Defend ant is permitted 20 days thereafter to file a supplemental reply, also not to exceed 20 pages in length. The 1/26/2010 final pretrial conference and 2/8/2010 trial dates are CONTINUED. New dates will be established, if necessary, following the court's ruling on the pending motion. See Order for particulars. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/6/2010.(LBT)
|
July 27, 2009 |
Filing
125
ORDER ON FOURTH MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES - Plaintiffs' Fourth Motion to Compel Discovery Responses 113 is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant is to produce all electronically stored information responsive to plaintiffs 039; Second Request for Document Production in its "native format." Furthermore, defendant is to produce an individual who can assist plaintiffs in searching defendant's relevant databases. Plaintiffs' request for sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 7/27/2009. (JLM)
|
January 12, 2009 |
Filing
90
ORDER granting 39 Motion for Protective Order for Noticed Deposition of James O'Sullivan. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 1/12/09. (LBT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?