CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. SUD-CHEMIE AG et al
| CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
| AIRSEC S.A.S., SUD-CHEMIE AG and SUD-CHEMIE, INC. |
| 4:2011cv00029 |
| March 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Richard L. Young |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
215
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S BILL OF COSTS - For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' request for costs 177 is GRANTED in the amount of $94,766.88: (1) $120.00 for fees to the Clerk; (2) $480.88 in transcript fees; and (3) $94,166.00 for exemplification and the cost of making copies. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 5/20/2015.(JLM)
|
|
Filing
169
ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT - 107 Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement is GRANTED. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 2/6/2014. (LBT)
|
|
Filing
139
ENTRY DENYING 103 CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DIRECT INFRINGEMENT - Having so found, the court need not decide whether Defendants' accused product, the Handy Active Tube, is missing a "lip that extends upward from the top of the container," as required by claim 1(b)(ii) and claim 7(b)(ii). Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 9/27/2013. (JLM)
|
|
Filing
126
ENTRY ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION - The purpose of this order is to construe the claims placed in issue and more specifically the terms highlighted by the parties. This being done, the parties may proceed accordingly with the underlying infringement suit. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 6/3/2013. (LBT)
|
|
Filing
99
ENTRY ON CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'S PARTIAL MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS - Defendants' inequitable conduct counterclaim, designated as Counterclaim IV in Defendants' Amended Counterclaim, must be dismissed. 75 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 11/2/2012. (LBT)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED AND UNITED ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND COUNTERCLAIMS - Defendants' Motion 70 is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 5/2/2012. (JLM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
