SAUTER et al v. PERFECT NORTH SLOPES, INC. et al
| JAMES STEPHEN SAUTER and PIPER SAUTER |
| STEPHANIE DANIEL ANTHROP, ANDREW BROADDUS, CHRISTOPHER DANIEL, PERFECT NORTH SLOPES, INC., ANTHONY WARR and JENNY WARR |
| 4:2012cv00027 |
| March 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| New Albany Office |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| William G. Hussmann |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
178
ENTRY DENYING MOTION TO CERTIFY FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL - 155 Motion to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal is DENIED. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/5/2014. (LBT)
|
|
Filing
153
ENTRY ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 85 The Snow Tube Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Sauters' claims against the Snow Tube Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. 75 Perfect North Slopes' Motion for Summary Judg ment is DENIED. The Sauters' negligence claim may proceed. No final judgment will issue for the Snow Tube Defendants until the remaining claims against Perfect North Slopes are resolved. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/3/2014. (LBT)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying 47 Motion for Leave to File Crossclaim against Defendant Perfect North Slopes, Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr., on 7/11/2012. (NRN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
