OGDEN v. PATRIOT MUNICIPAL UTILITY
Plaintiff: SHERRY OGDEN
Defendant: PATRIOT MUNICIPAL UTILITY
Case Number: 4:2013cv00072
Filed: May 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: New Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 16 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) Motion for Discovery 21 is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint 22 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/22/2014.(JLM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: OGDEN v. PATRIOT MUNICIPAL UTILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PATRIOT MUNICIPAL UTILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHERRY OGDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?