TIDD v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
Plaintiff: BRIAN TIDD
Defendant: JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA, NORMAN PHILLIPS, STATE OF INDIANA, THE 40TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT and THE JACKSON COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Case Number: 4:2015cv00007
Filed: January 14, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: New Albany Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Richard L. Young
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 61 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and 63 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The court will enter judgment accordingly. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 3/10/2017. (LBT)
July 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ENTRY ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINTS AND ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT - 26 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial is GRANTED. 24 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial is DENIED as moot. 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED, and 18 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is DENIED as moot. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Richard L. Young on 7/14/2015. (LBT)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TIDD v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA
Represented By: Wayne E. Uhl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NORMAN PHILLIPS
Represented By: Wayne E. Uhl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA
Represented By: Melinda Jae Schwer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE 40TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Represented By: Melinda Jae Schwer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THE JACKSON COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Represented By: Wayne E. Uhl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BRIAN TIDD
Represented By: Eric J Hartz
Represented By: John H. Haskin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?