Duncan v. Mapes

Petitioner: Vincent Duncan
Respondent: Terry Mapes
Case Number: 1:2012cv00109
Filed: October 26, 2012
Court: Iowa Northern District Court
Office: Cedar Rapids Office
County: Tama
Presiding Judge: Linda R Reade
Referring Judge: Jon S Scoles
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 26, 2012 4 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Vincent Duncan: The petitioners application for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is dismissed,and a certificate of appealability is denied. (See order text). Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 10/26/12. (ksy)(copy w/NEF to Plf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duncan v. Mapes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Vincent Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Terry Mapes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.