Givens v. Tvedt et al
| Gregory Givens |
| Cory J Goldensoph and Daniel Tvedt |
| 1:2013cv00083 |
| August 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Cedar Rapids Office |
| Linn |
| Linda R Reade |
| Jon S Scoles |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
INITIAL Review Order Dismissing Case as Frivolous: 1 Application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The clerks office is directed to file the complaint without the prepayment of the filing fee. The plaintiff is directed to submit an initial p artial filing fee of $1.00 by no later than 11/29/2013. After the plaintiff pays the initial partial filing fee, the institution having custody of the plaintiff is directed to collect and remit monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 USC 1915(b)(2). The clerks office is directed to send a copy of this order and the notice of collection of filing fee to the appropriate official at the place where the plaintiff is an inmate. The plaintiffs 42 USC 1983 action is dismissed pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B). The dismissal of the instant action counts against the plaintiff for purposes of the three-dismissal rule set forth in 28 USC 1915(g). Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 10/30/2013. (NEF and order mailed to Plaintiff; Order mailed to Warden) (pac)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
