James v. Rasmussen et al
| Patrick James, Sr |
| Cedar Rapids, City of, Grant Rasmussen and Bruce Payne |
| 1:2015cv00062 |
| July 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Cedar Rapids Office |
| Linn |
| Edward J McManus |
| Jon S Scoles |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER granting 69 Motion for Attorney Fees: Judgment will enter in favor of Plaintiff Patrick James, Sr., and against Defendant Bruce Payne for attorney fees in the amount of One Hundred Five Thousand Fifty-Four Dollars. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 12/22/2016. (skm)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 31 Motion in Limine; denying 32 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion in Limine (see text of Order). Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Jon S Scoles on 10/20/2016. (skm)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER denying 19 Motion to Correct and Revise 17 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Edward J McManus on 08/03/16. (jjh)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants Cedar Rapids, City of, Bruce Payne, Grant Rasmussen. Granted as to defendant City of Cedar Rapids. Denied as to defendants Bruce Payne and Grant Rasmussen. Signed by Senior Judge Edward J McManus on 07/19/16. (jjh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
