Riches v. Bitcoin et al
Riches and Jonathan Lee Riches |
Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto and Martti Malmi |
1:2016cv00019 |
January 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Cedar Rapids Office |
Linn |
Linda R Reade |
Jon S Scoles |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MAIL Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jonathan Lee Riches which included NEF of #1 Complaint, #2 Order, and #3 Judgment. Mail re-sent to new address provided by Mr Riches on mail received on 3/14/2016. (pac) |
Filing 3 JUDGMENT: Plaintiff take nothing and this action is dismissed. Signed by Clerk on 2/3/16. (ksy)(copy w/NEF to Plf) |
Filing 2 ORDER re #1 Complaint filed by Jonathan Lee Riches: The plaintiff submits neither the filing fee nor an application to proceed in forma pauperis. In the event that the plaintiff had filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, the court would have denied it because the plaintiff has abused the judicial process, and venue in this district is not proper. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 2/3/16. (ksy)(copy w/NEF to Plf) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Bitcoin, Martti Malmi, Satoshi Nakamoto filed by Jonathan Lee Riches. Dismissal Deadline 5/10/2016. (NEF mailed to plaintiff) (pac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.