Crowley v. Commissioner of Social Security
| JAMES J. CROWLEY and James J Crowley |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2019cv00035 |
| March 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Kelly KE Mahoney |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 SOCIAL Security Briefing Schedule Order. Pursuant to 42 USC Sec. 405(g) and Local Rule 16(d)(1), this case will be submitted to the Court as follows: Plaintiff proposed stipulation of facts to Defendant (not filed with Court) not later than 30 days from this date. Defendant response to Plaintiff not later than 60 days. Statement of Facts due for filing by 8/24/2019. Plaintiff's Brief due by 9/8/2019. Defendant's Brief due by 10/8/2019. Plaintiff's Reply Brief due by 10/18/2019. Signed by Clerk on 6/10/2019. (pac) |
| DOCKET Annotation re #10 Social Security Transcript Vol 1, and #11 Social Security Transcript Vol 2. Tabbed and bound hard copies of two volumes of transcripts received, and housed in SC Clerk's office. |
| Filing 11 SOCIAL Security Transcript Filed (Part 2 of 2) (Attachments: #1 Transcript Part 15 of 22, #2 Transcript Part 16 of 22, #3 Transcript Part 17 of 22, #4 Transcript Part 2 of 22Transcript Part 18 of 22, #5 Transcript Part 19 of 22, #6 Transcript Part 20 of 22, #7 Transcript Part 21 of 22, #8 Transcript Part 22 of 22) (Schunk, Jacob) |
| Filing 10 SOCIAL Security Transcript Filed (Part 1 of 2) (Attachments: #1 Transcript Part 2 of 22, #2 Transcript Part 3 of 22, #3 Transcript Part 4 of 22, #4 Transcript Part 5 of 22, #5 Transcript Part 6 of 22, #6 Transcript Part 7 of 22, #7 Transcript Part 8 of 22, #8 Transcript Part 9 of 22, #9 Transcript Part 10 of 22, #10 Transcript Part 11 of 22, #11 Transcript Part 12 of 22, #12 Transcript Part 13 of 22) (Schunk, Jacob) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint (Transcript e-filed separately) by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Schunk, Jacob) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Elvi D Jenkins on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Jenkins, Elvi) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Upon consent of the parties Commissioner of Social Security and James J Crowley, this case is assigned to Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly Mahoney for final disposition. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 4/19/19. (ksy)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by James J Crowley re #1 Complaint Certified Returned Receipts for Process Service of Complaint (Johnson, J) Modified text on 4/22/2019 (pac). |
| Filing 5 (FILED IN ERROR) NOTICE by James J Crowley Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge (Johnson, J) Modified text on 4/22/2019 (pac). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob A Schunk on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Schunk, Jacob) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security. ****PLEASE MAKE COPIES OF SUMMONS FOR EACH DEFENDANT AND FILL IN REMAINING INFORMATION**** (Attachments: #1 Social Security Case Packet) (pac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge. Check Status Deadline due by 4/24/2019. (pac) |
| Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly Mahoney added (no conflicts identified). (pac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0862-2902228.), filed by James J Crowley. Scheduling Report due by 6/20/2019 (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Johnson, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
