Reh v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
Petitioner: Prya Reh
Respondent: Department of Human Services, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Department of Homeland Security
Case Number: 1:2021cv00032
Filed: March 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Presiding Judge: Mark A Roberts
Referring Judge: CJ Williams
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2021 Filing 5 MAIL Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Prya Reh which included Fee Receipt. Return to Sender. No fwd address. (ksy)
April 15, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss by Respondent Department of Homeland Security Responses due by 4/29/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration Exhibit A) (Schunk, Jacob)
April 13, 2021 FEE Receipt: $5.00, receipt number IAN110029192 for filing fee for writ of habeas corpus by Prya Reh. (NEF mailed to petitioner) (pac)
April 7, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacob A Schunk on behalf of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Schunk, Jacob)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Petitioner will be given thirty days from the date of this order to either pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve the petition, along with a copy of this order, via certified mail, on the respondent care of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Iowa. Respondent is directed to file an answer within forty-five days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge CJ Williams on 4/5/2021. (copy mailed to Petitioner, petition and order certified mail to USA) (jjh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/6/2021: #1 Return Receipt) (jjh).
March 22, 2021 Filing 1 PRO SE PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Prya Reh. Dismissal Deadline 7/6/2021. (PSLC) (NEF mailed to Petitioner) (sgw)
March 22, 2021 Judge CJ Williams and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (sgw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reh v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Department of Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Represented By: Jacob A Schunk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Jacob A Schunk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Prya Reh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?