Robinson v. McPartland et al
Matthew Lamont Robinson |
Judge Sean McPartland, Sarah Smith, Lindsey Gardner and Monica Slaughter |
1:2022cv00011 |
February 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
Leonard T Strand |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 PRO SE NOTICE of Change of Address by Matthew Lamont Robinson. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00011-LTS-KEM, 1:21-cv-00037-LTS-MAR, 1:21-cv-00051-LTS-KEM, 1:22-cv-00005-LTS-KEM, 1:22-cv-00007-LTS-KEM (NEF w/docket sheet mailed to Plt). (skm) |
Filing 4 PRO SE SUPPLEMENT to #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Lamont Robinson. (PSLC) (NEF mailed to Plaintiff) (jlh) |
Filing 3 PRO SE NOTICE of Change of Address by Matthew Lamont Robinson. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00011-LTS-KEM, 1:21-cv-00037-LTS-MAR, 1:21-cv-00051-LTS-KEM, 1:22-cv-00005-LTS-KEM, 1:22-cv-00007-LTS-KEM. (NEF mailed to Pltf) (jjh) |
Filing 2 PRO SE SUPPLEMENT re #1 Pro Se Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Matthew Lamont Robinson (PSLC) (nef mailed to plaintiff) (des) |
Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Matthew Lamont Robinson (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (PSLC) (nef mailed to plaintiff) (des) |
Chief Judge Leonard T Strand and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added. No conflicts identified. (des) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.