Emrit v. Musk et al
Ronald Satish Emrit |
Elon Musk, Department of Government Efficiency, Mike Johnson and Vivek Ramaswamy |
1:2025cv00006 |
January 13, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
Judge Kelly KE Mahoney |
CJ Williams |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 USCA Case Number 25-1240 for #4 Pro Se Notice of Appeal filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. District Court to forward any portion of the original record not available through PACER. (no documents to forward) (des) |
Filing 5 NOA Supplement and Transmission of Notice of Appeal to US Court of Appeals re #4 Pro Se Notice of Appeal. Case Number due by 2/10/2025. (Copy to Plaintiff)(des) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE of Interlocutory Appeal as to #2 Order by Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit (PSLC) (NEF to Plaintiff) (des) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Dismissal Pursuant to Local Rule 41(a)(4). Unless appropriate action is taken by 2/19/2025, this action will be dismissed. Signed by Clerk on 2/5/2025. (Attachments #1 LR 41) (PSLC) (Copy to Plaintiff) (des) |
![]() |
Filing 1 PRO SE MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint) (PSLC) (NEF to Plaintiff) (jlh) |
Chief Judge CJ Williams and Chief Magistrate Judge Kelly K.E. Mahoney added. No conflicts identified. (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.