Macdougall v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Ivelisse Macdougall |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Ssaogcomms |
| 1:2025cv00007 |
| January 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 DOCKET Annotation: Please see New Case Packet attached. (kms) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge. Check Status Deadline due by 7/14/2025. (kms) |
| Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (kms) |
| Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules of Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. Commissioner of Social Security served on 1/15/2025, answer due 3/17/2025. (kms) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AIANDC-4323826), filed by Ivelisse Macdougall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Steadman, Casey) Modified text on 1/16/2025 (kms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
