Harlston v. Bartruff
Petitioner: Kenyatta S Harlston, Jr
Respondent: Jerry Bartruff
Case Number: 2:2017cv01016
Filed: June 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Eastern Dubuque Office
County: Dubuque
Presiding Judge: Kelly Mahoney
Presiding Judge: Linda R Reade
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting 8 Motion to Substitute Party. The clerk's office is directed to remove Jerry Bartruff and substitute William Sperfslage as the respondent in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kelly Mahoney on 9/8/2017. Order/NEF mailed to petitioner. (src)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harlston v. Bartruff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenyatta S Harlston, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jerry Bartruff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?