Davids v. United States Department of Agriculture
Plaintiff: Karen G Davids
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture
Case Number: 3:2017cv03091
Filed: November 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Central Division Office
County: Kossuth
Presiding Judge: Kelly Mahoney
Presiding Judge: Linda R Reade
Nature of Suit: Agricultural Acts
Cause of Action: 07:6999
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Adopting 30 Report and Recommendations for 1 Complaint filed by Karen G Davids. The final decision of the USDA is affirmed. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Linda R Reade on 03/18/2019. (jjh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davids v. United States Department of Agriculture
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen G Davids
Represented By: Thomas A Lawler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture
Represented By: Jacob A Schunk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?