Doyle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Ronald Dean Doyle
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2018cv03040
Filed: June 7, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Central Division Office
County: Humboldt
Presiding Judge: Kelly Mahoney
Presiding Judge: Leonard T Strand
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42:423
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 3 Complaint filed by Ronald Dean Doyle: The final decision of the Commissioner is affirmed. Judgment shall enter against Doyle and in favor of the Commissioner. Signed by Chief Judge Leonard T Strand on 8/22/2019. (mmc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doyle v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Dean Doyle
Represented By: Blake Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?