United States of America v. Rosentrater
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Karen R. Rosentrater
Case Number: 5:2011cv04069
Filed: August 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
Office: Western Division Office
County: Cherokee
Presiding Judge: Donald E OBrien
Presiding Judge: Paul A Zoss
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting 6 Motion for Summary Judgment (See Order Text). Signed by Senior Judge Donald E OBrien on 3/7/2012. (des)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Rosentrater
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Lawrence D Kudej
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen R. Rosentrater
Represented By: John Matthew Loughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?