Ingram v. United States of America
||United States of America
||August 27, 2014
||US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa
||Western Division Office
||Mark W Bennett
||Leonard T Strand
|Nature of Suit:
||Motions to Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2255
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 31, 2017
OPINION and Order granting 25 Motion To Expand The Record and 28 Amended Motion To Expand The Record. 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) (Criminal Action CR07-4056-MWB-2) as amended at at docket entry 10 is denied in it s entirety. No certificate of appealability will issue as to Petitioner's Eighth Amendment claim or any contention in that claim. A certificate of appealability shall issue as to Petitioner's equal protection/selective prosecution claim and the contentions in that claim. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 10/31/2017. (des)
|February 9, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Granting in part and denying in part 3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by United States of America. See order text for details. Certain claims in Ingram's August 27, 2014 pro se 2255 1 motion are dismissed. No certificate of appealability shall issue from this court as to the dismissal of these claims. Ingram shall have to and including March 11, 2016 to file an Amended 2255 Motion, with the assistance of habeas counsel. The respondent sh all have to and including April 11, 2016, to file either an answer, or an appropriate motion. The court will set a further briefing schedule, as appropriate, after the filing of the respondent's answer or motion. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 02/09/2016. (src)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?