Nelson et al v. Bitters et al
| Clarence G Nelson, Jr and Valora L Nelson |
| William E Bitters and Robert W Boland, Jr |
| 5:2015cv04077 |
| September 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Western Division Office |
| Woodbury |
| Mark W Bennett |
| Leonard T Strand |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 41 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 46 Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice; and denying 47 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave of Court to Designate Experts Out of Time. (See order text) Signed by Magistrate Judge CJ Williams on 1/24/17. (ksy)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER denying 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant William E Bitters; granting 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant Roland W Boland, Jr. The Clerk of Court is instructed to seal Exhibits C, F, and I, which were attached to plaintiffs amended complaint (Doc. 22 ), pursuant to Local Rule 10(h). Signed by Magistrate Judge CJ Williams on 3/18/2016. (des)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for attorney James E. Connor on behalf of Plaintiffs Clarence G. Nelson, Jr., and Valora L. Nelson. Signed by Clerk on 9/28/2015 (conflicts checked; none found). (skm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
